A blog by Luke Akehurst about politics, elections, and the Labour Party - With subtitles for the Hard of Left. Just for the record: all the views expressed here are entirely personal and do not necessarily represent the positions of any organisations I am a member of.

Monday, July 16, 2007

Getting the expectations game wrong

I went away at the weekend to celebrate my dad's 69th birthday (which puts him in the right age bracket to be a Labour by-election candidate nowadays) and therefore missed the opportunity to react to Labour hitting 40% in the opinion polls and Tory Ealing candidate Tony Lit turning out to be even less partisan than anyone realised.

It strikes me that the Tories have not learnt two important things about by-elections:

1) The degree of scrutiny your candidate will come under in a by-election means you need a ruthless panel process to weed out, for instance, folk who just attended the other party's fundraising dinner, had their photo taken with the other party's leader and made a large donation to do so. It doesn't mean that you headhunt people with local status without checking their background. Labour learnt all about the need for really hardline selection procedures in by-elections the hard way, after Deirdre Wood lost us the Greenwich by-election and Bob Gillespie lost us the Govan by-election. In by-elections a dull candidate who offers no hostages to fortune is preferable to a controversial one.

2) Managing expectations is critical. If the Tories had said they hoped to move from third to second in a safe Labour seat, they might be on track to match that expectation and get good coverage. But they've implied they could win and sent Cameron down to the seat 4 times so that success or failure is linked to him personally. That's created a situation where as long as Labour just holds on, it will be portrayed as a Tory failure to match expectations.

David Cameron has gambled the credibility of his leadership by associating himself so personally with this by-election.

If Lit loses on Thursday - which I think he will - the vultures on the David Davis wing of the Tories will be circling. And that could make an autumn general election very tempting - how about Thursday 27 September as polling day so that Labour benefits from the PM's speech to conference on Monday 24th, then scraps the rest of the event, and the Tory conference is after polling day? Just an idea.

UPDATE: someone has correctly commented that my idea above would fall foul of media coverage impartiality rules. So maybe another scenario is that GB announces the date of the election during conference week, with a four week campaign ending on 25 Oct?


Anonymous David said...

Not to mention Southwark back in 1982

Running as "David Cameron's Conservatives" is a huge tactical error. Does it imply that elsewhere if your Tory is not so branded that they are part of the old, "nasty" Tory party? What happens if you lose badly as DC's Conservative?

12:15 pm, July 16, 2007

Blogger E10 Rifle said...

Humiliating defeat for Cameron would be a rousing non-vindication of his attempt to ape Blair's 'touchy-feely charisma' act, and would thus be of enormous benefit not just to Labour but British politics in general.

What sort of things were people saying in Southall? (The voters, that is, not the campaigners)

12:39 pm, July 16, 2007

Blogger UK Daily Pundit said...


12:53 pm, July 16, 2007

Anonymous pregethwr said...

In 1974 conferences were delayed for an autumn general election. Since they are so much bigger now I would guess that can't happen.

So a general election would have to be called after they finished (because of the law on impartiality).

Of course that doesn't mean Tory conference couldn't be overshadowed by frenzied speculation about an imminent general election.

1:40 pm, July 16, 2007

Anonymous jdc said...

Wasn't the main focus of the media campaign against Deirdre Wood that she was a lesbian, rather than anything much to do with her politics?

4:32 pm, July 16, 2007

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Early election:

I think spring next year is more likley. Don't forget this is when most of the tax changes announced this year come into play.

4:51 pm, July 16, 2007

Anonymous David said...

I don't think we should get too excited about an election soon.

As Clintonistas would say, "it's the economy stupid". a) let's wait until a new tax regime works through and b) until interest rates have stopped rising and, ideally, have started falling again.

5:23 pm, July 16, 2007

Blogger Chris Paul said...

There is an Ealing Southall "poll" linked from :

And June 2009 by the way

10:10 pm, July 16, 2007

Blogger Normal Mouth said...

But they've implied they could win and sent Cameron down to the seat 4 times so that success or failure is linked to him personally

Success or failure will be linked to him personally, anyway.

6:53 am, July 18, 2007


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

Free Hit Counters
OfficeDepot Discount